Fashion over function

Friday, September 09, 2005

"It's impossibly small." "It's thinner than a NO.2 pencil." - Apple CEO Steve Jobs commenting on the new iPod nano.

Stop, everybody just shut it down and stop for a second. Now, iPods are amazing devices; I've come to depend on mine. My CDs have been collecting dust since I purchased mine a few months ago. I get home from work and plug the iPod into the stereo. Boom, rock. Everything at the push of a button. Technology babies we surely are.

One thing that kept me from being an early adopter to the iPod was the price tag. They originally started at around $400 US. I was content with my CD collection and since I was commuting by car that had a CD player I didn't really care about any sort of portable mp3 player. My friends who were on the train and walking a hundred blocks a day in the city all had iPods before me, which made total sense. And of course as time went on the price went down and the memory went up. So I went for it. I purchased the standard 20 GB model.

So now iPods are all the rage and it doesn't surprise me at all. They are smart and quality. If you can afford it, get it, you'll love it. Now, again, back to the financials of it. Dropping a few hundred dollars isn't easy for most. But I don't really think people are checking out the specs on these before they're buying. It seems that they're looking at the ones that come in pretty colors, or now the one that is the thinnest and just impulse buying. What ever happened to reading the fine print (it's not really that fine I guess) and seeing what you're getting for your money?

Let's do some math and compare two of the above-mentioned models.

nano : 4 GB : 1.5 ounces : $249
iPod : 20 GB : 5.9 ounces : $299

Ok, so now. The only thing the nano has going for it is its weight. We're talking about ounces here kids. Oh, you're sporty and you like to run with your iPod and you want the nano because it's ultra light? If you can't handle an extra 4 ounces on your jog then you should make a beeline to Hooters and give up. This is ridiculous. The difference here is you get 16 more gigs (approximately 4000 songs) for $50 more. And this pricing is for the new standard iPod that comes with a color screen! Compare all of the specs here.

4 Comments:

At Friday, September 09, 2005, Anonymous Larissa said...

The hooters thing... Zing! Good one!

 
At Friday, September 09, 2005, Anonymous Steve said...

If I may offer a rebuttal to the esteemed Mr. Downey, the Nano does happen to be a better choice for runners. Since the Nano's memory works from a USB flash drive and not a standard hard drive, there aren't any moving parts inside that are going to burn out or break from the stress of repeated jostling, bumping and shaking. In the same sense, you couldn't shake your laptop constantly while you're working on it and have it turn out okay, either.

But, if people are making their choice on weight alone, then yeah, it's kind of silly.

 
At Friday, September 09, 2005, Blogger mike downey said...

hey steve, you are absoltuely right. i overlooked this. i'd think that Apple would boast about this in their adverts, which they don't.

 
At Friday, September 09, 2005, Blogger aj said...

I personally don't want to spend $250 on something I could potentially lose by sneezing in its general direction.

thinner than a #2 pencil? so, what, you can sneak it in when you take the SAT's? fuck-a-doodle-doo.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home